Most forms of alimony terminate upon the remarriage of the recipient, such as bridge-the-gap, durational, and permanent alimony. See 61.16(5), (7) & (8), Fla. Stat. (2016). However, there is no incentive for a former spouse receiving alimony to get remarried. The alimony recipient will cohabitate with their significant other and forego a marital relationship, thus avoiding the automatic termination of the alimony award.
In 2005, the Florida legislature codified existing common law to provide that a financially supportive relationship could form the basis to reduce or terminate an award of alimony. Section 61.14(1)(b)1 states, in pertinent part, that:
“[t]he court may reduce or terminate an award of alimony upon specific written findings by the court that since the granting of a divorce and the award of alimony a supportive relationship has existed between the obligee (recipient) and a person with whom the obligee resides.”
The obligor, or person paying alimony, has the burden to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that a supportive relationship exists. The Court is instructed to consider several factors to determine whether a supportive relationship exists including, but not limited to, the following:
- The extent to which the obligee and the other person have held themselves out as a married couple by engaging in conduct such as using the same last name, using a common mailing address, referring to each other in terms such as “my husband” or “my wife,” or otherwise conducting themselves in a manner that evidences a permanent supportive relationship.
- The period of time that the obligee has resided with the other person in a permanent place of abode.
- The extent to which the obligee and the other person have pooled their assets or income or otherwise exhibited financial interdependence.
- The extent to which the obligee or the other person has supported the other, in whole or in part.
- The extent to which the obligee or the other person has performed valuable services for the other.
- The extent to which the obligee or the other person has performed valuable services for the other’s company or employer.
- Whether the obligee and the other person have worked together to create or enhance anything of value.
- Whether the obligee and the other person have jointly contributed to the purchase of any real or personal property.
- Evidence in support of a claim that the obligee and the other person have an express agreement regarding property sharing or support.
- Evidence in support of a claim that the obligee and the other person have an implied agreement regarding property sharing or support.
- Whether the obligee and the other person have provided support to the children of one another, regardless of any legal duty to do so.
For a modification based on a support relationship, it is essential to prove as many of the statutory factors set forth above to increase your chances of success. Proving these factors will ultimately depend on the facts and circumstances of the case. Typically, it will involve testimony of various witnesses and financial records to show a pattern of behavior.
If you are paying alimony and your former spouse is cohabitating with a significant other, you may have a claim to modify or terminate your alimony. It is highly recommended that you seek the advice from a marital and family law attorney with experience in these types of matters before taking any legal action so that you can make an informed decision as how best to proceed.
Jonathan Z. Schiller is a Florida Bar Board Certified Specialist in Marital and Family Law. He has extensive experience in handling complex marital and family law matters, with special emphasis on dissolution of marriage, parental responsibility and time-sharing, equitable distribution, business valuation, alimony, child support, attorney’s fees, preparation and enforcement of prenuptial and postnuptial agreements, paternity, domestic violence, and child dependency. He can be reached at 954-522-2200.
The material appearing on this blog is meant to provide general information only and is not a substitute for nor is it legal advice to you. With regard to specific law issues, readers of this article should seek specific advice from legal counsel of their choice. Articles may not be reprinted without the express permission of Brinkley Morgan. Remember that the hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely upon advertisements. Before you decide, ask us to send you free written information about our qualifications and experience.